File:Vantage Appeal Form.jpg

Summary

A piece of paper lays on a table next to a wooden whistle. It is labeled "Apex Games Ruling Appeal Form" and says:

Claimant Name: Xiomara “Vantage” Contreras Appealing: Rulebook Ruling Rulebook Code Referenced: RULE 13: Unauthorized Instruments - Article 773: Pets

The following section of text is crossed out: "I am asking for another appeal because Echo is not my pet on the battlefield. Sure, I've named an animal and I feed it treats for doing the things I want, but Echo is closer to that "non combatant technology" classification you gave to DOC and NEWT. Echo will be assisting me while I hunt down and dominate my opponents. Like I mentioned earlier, Ajay Che talks to DOC like a pet, Dr. Mary Somers talks to NEWT like a pet, but both of them user their respective "pets" to assist them during the games. Plus, Echo wears a little backpack so that kind of makes him part machine too."

The following message written underneath the crossed out section: "Comments for consideration: Bloodhound has a raven! This is actually my new reason that I am asking you to reconsider your decision, and allow Echo to enter the Apex Games with me. Bloodhound’s flying pet is mean and bullies other legends like Pathfinder. Echo is nice. Well, usually. It’d be unfair to block Echo because of an unfortunate and out of character attack on another prospect during a tryout match. Echo was confused–as we all were–by the contestant’s bushy eyebrows–they looked like grubs. And he likes to eat grubs (can you blame him? They’re great!). If you want me in the Games, Echo comes with me. I await your response."

Licensing

This file, or parts of it, comes from Apex Legends or from websites created and owned by Electronic Arts Inc. or Respawn Entertainment, who hold the copyright of Apex Legends. All trademarks and registered trademarks present in the file are proprietary to Electronic Arts Inc.. For more information, see the copyright notice. The use of images to illustrate articles concerning the subject of the image in question is believed to qualify as fair use under United States copyright law, as such display does not significantly impede the right of the copyright holder to sell the copyrighted material.